In a paper published in January by the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Almár and Race propose the brilliant idea of creating a metric to "provide a scalar assessment of the scientific importance, validity and potential risks associated with putative evidence of ET
Just what I always wanted! My two biggest fears in ONE CONVENIENT METRIC!!!!
Luckily, as Michael Shermer
Almár and Race propose the London Scale that multiplies Q x δ, where Q (scientific importance) is the sum of four parameters:All of which misses the point. Subjective or not, this juxtaposition of alien invasion
This sum is then multiplied by δ (a reliability factor) ranging from 0.1–0.5, from probably not real to highly reliable. The maximum Q can be is 20 x .5 = 10.
- life form (1–5, from Earth-similar life to completely alien),
- nature of evidence (1-6, from indirect biomarkers to obviously organized complex life),
- type of method of discovery (1–5, from remote sensing to return mission sample), and
- distance (1–4, from beyond the Solar System to on Earth).
Now all the invaders from Tau Ceti b or Gliese 581 d have to do is make their biology look Earthlike or limit their evidentiary droppings to indirect biomarkers, and we'll give them a low rating on the Almár-Race scale and thus ignore them. Next thing you know, BAM! We're all toiling in a Manthourian beryllium mine or harvesting dry ice from Zarmina
's perma-night side.
It's just a matter of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Got some feedback for The Math Skeptic? Post it here and keep it civil.